ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
The role of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in predicting survival and rehospitalization after surgical aortic valve replacement.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), calculated using serum albumin levels and blood lymphocyte count, reflects a patient's nutritional and immune status. It is commonly used as a prognostic tool following oncological surgery and in certain cardiovascular conditions. This study aims to assess whether the PNI can also serve as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: A total of 471 low-risk patients with EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) of ≤4%, who underwent isolated SAVR, were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups based on their PNI values (cut-off, 46.75). Outcomes such as length of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, and rehospitalization rates were compared between the groups. Results: The Low PNI group consisted of 116 patients, while the High PNI group included 355 patients. The latter were younger, but both groups had comparable comorbidities. All patients underwent SAVR with a bioprosthesis. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (Low PNI, 2.6% vs. High PNI, 0.9%, Conclusions: The PNI is an inexpensive, accessible, and reliable tool that can be easily integrated into existing risk stratification scores for SAVR. Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-024-01891-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.