ArticleJPRAS open2025
Local and regional flaps in scalp reconstructions: A retrospective analysis.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study demonstrates the broad applicability of local and regional flaps for the treatment of scalp defects of varying size and etiology. We aimed to verify whether the following variables correlate with the postoperative complication rate, length of hospitalization, and postoperative inpatient course, i.e., etiology of the defect, surgical technique, duration of surgery, defect size, localization, comorbidities, and neoadjuvant radiation. We examined whether the complications had an impact on the hospitalization and postoperative inpatient course. The inclusion criteria were defects in the scalp, reconstruction between 2010 and 2021, and use of local or regional fasciocutaneous flap. In this study, the following parameters were considered such as gender, age, main diagnosis, comorbidities, defect etiology, size and localization, type of surgical treatment, surgery duration, hospitalization, postoperative inpatient course, local complications, and revisions. A total of 39 patients (mean age: 56.5 ± 20.5 years) were selected. Postoperative complications did not correlate with defect etiology, surgical technique, defect size, defect localization, surgery duration, comorbidities, and local radiation. Postoperative complications, comorbidities, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy influenced the length of hospitalization. The postoperative inpatient course was influenced by the surgery duration and postoperative complications. Defect etiology, surgical technique, defect size, and defect localization had no impact on the overall hospitalization. Local and regional flaps are safe and reliable options for the treatment of scalp defects up to 80 cm². Their use in the study resulted in excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes. The risk of complications and revisions is considered as low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.