ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
A method of rice panicle number counting based on improved CSRNet model.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Advanced deep learning vision transformer models for intelligent grain counting in agricultural data analytics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Combining ability and gene action for flowering, plant height, grain size, and yield in rice (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rice is one of the world's leading food crops, with nearly half of the world's population eating rice as their staple food. Rice yield is directly related to varieties, and the most intuitive agronomic trait of varietal yield is the number of grains per panicle. Methods: In this study, rice panicles are taken as the research object, and images of the panicles are captured using a smartphone. The CSRNet counting model based on deep learning is then improved and applied to the problem of counting the number of grains per panicle in rice. Results and discussion: The results show that the method of this study has a mean error value of 3.83% on the final validation set. On this basis, the development of rice per panicle counting APP based on Android terminal and batch counting software RiceGrainCounter based on PC terminal realizes real-time counting on Android terminal and batch counting on PC terminal, which can provide theoretical basis and technical support for rice per panicle counting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.