Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247921›Full record

ArticleMachine learning: science and technology2025

Prior guided deep difference meta-learner for fast adaptation to stylized segmentation.

Dan Nguyen, Anjali Balagopal, Ti Bai, Michael Dohopolski, Mu-Han Lin, Steve Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning: science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan NguyenMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9590-0655
Anjali BalagopalMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-4468
Ti BaiMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-7434
Michael DohopolskiMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9043-1490
Mu-Han LinMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Steve JiangMedical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3083-6752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy treatment planning requires segmenting anatomical structures in various styles, influenced by guidelines, protocols, preferences, or dose planning needs. Deep learning-based auto-segmentation models, trained on anatomical definitions, may not match local clinicians' styles at new institutions. Adapting these models can be challenging without sufficient resources. We hypothesize that consistent differences between segmentation styles and anatomical definitions can be learned from initial patients and applied to pre-trained models for more precise segmentation. We propose a Prior-guided deep difference meta-learner (DDL) to learn and adapt these differences. We collected data from 440 patients for model development and 30 for testing. The dataset includes contours of the prostate clinical target volume (CTV), parotid, and rectum. We developed a deep learning framework that segments new images with a matching style using example styles as a prior, without model retraining. The pre-trained segmentation models were adapted to three different clinician styles for post-operative CTV for prostate, parotid gland, and rectum segmentation. We tested the model's ability to learn unseen styles and compared its performance with transfer learning, using varying amounts of prior patient style data (0-10 patients). Performance was quantitatively evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance. With exposure to only three patients for the model, the average DSC (%) improved from 78.6, 71.9, 63.0, 69.6, 52.2 and 46.3-84.4, 77.8, 73.0, 77.8, 70.5, 68.1, for CTV

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerclinician stylizationdeep learningmeta-learningoncologysegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40247921
PMCPMC12001319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.