ArticleMachine learning: science and technology2025
Prior guided deep difference meta-learner for fast adaptation to stylized segmentation.
Article in Machine learning: science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Horizons in Radiation Therapy Auto-Contouring: Distilling Insights, Embracing Data-Centric Frameworks, and Moving Beyond Geometric Quantification.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment planning requires segmenting anatomical structures in various styles, influenced by guidelines, protocols, preferences, or dose planning needs. Deep learning-based auto-segmentation models, trained on anatomical definitions, may not match local clinicians' styles at new institutions. Adapting these models can be challenging without sufficient resources. We hypothesize that consistent differences between segmentation styles and anatomical definitions can be learned from initial patients and applied to pre-trained models for more precise segmentation. We propose a Prior-guided deep difference meta-learner (DDL) to learn and adapt these differences. We collected data from 440 patients for model development and 30 for testing. The dataset includes contours of the prostate clinical target volume (CTV), parotid, and rectum. We developed a deep learning framework that segments new images with a matching style using example styles as a prior, without model retraining. The pre-trained segmentation models were adapted to three different clinician styles for post-operative CTV for prostate, parotid gland, and rectum segmentation. We tested the model's ability to learn unseen styles and compared its performance with transfer learning, using varying amounts of prior patient style data (0-10 patients). Performance was quantitatively evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance. With exposure to only three patients for the model, the average DSC (%) improved from 78.6, 71.9, 63.0, 69.6, 52.2 and 46.3-84.4, 77.8, 73.0, 77.8, 70.5, 68.1, for CTV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.