ArticleLearning health systems2025
Developing a codebook to characterize barriers, enablers, and strategies for implementing learning health systems from a multilevel perspective.
Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Barriers, Enablers, and Strategies for Implementing Learning Health System Projects in Healthcare Organizations: A Multilevel Analysis in an Australian Setting.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Quality Care Assessment in Gout.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Learning health system strategies in the AI era.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Developing a codebook to characterize barriers, enablers, and strategies for implementing learning health systems from a multilevel perspective.Learning health systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Learning health systems (LHSs) play a crucial role in improving healthcare delivery and outcomes through continuous learning and data-driven decision-making. Implementation of LHSs spans individual, organization, and systemic levels of healthcare. This paper outlines a systematic approach for developing a comprehensive codebook to identify barriers, enablers, and strategies associated with the establishment and operation of LHS from a multilevel perspective. Methods: The codebook development process was divided into two phases and employed a coding team. Phase 1 involved the synthesis of previous literature, which drove the development of initial codes. Phase 2 included the testing of the codebook with a pilot dataset to derive new codes or iterative refinement, ensuring robustness, and validity. Results: The literature search revealed 12 papers that detailed the barriers, enablers, and strategies for LHS implementation. Micro-level codes were derived from a mixture of existing literature and our pilot dataset. Most meso-level codes barriers and enablers were derived from the literature, with some subcodes derived from participant interviews. All strategies for implementation at the meso-level were identified in the literature. At the macro-level, all codes and subcodes were from the literature. Conclusions: The codebook contributes to the advancement of implementation science in LHS. The codebook facilitates effective analysis and understanding of the key factors influencing the success of LHS implementation, offering practical insights for policymakers, healthcare practitioners and researchers engaged in the ongoing evolution of LHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.