Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247896›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2025

Moving from crisis response to a learning health system: Experiences from an Australian regional primary care network.

Bianca Forrester, Georgia Fisher, Louise A Ellis, Andrew Giddy, Carolynn L Smith, Yvonne Zurynski, Lena Sanci, Katherine Graham, Naomi White, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bianca ForresterCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
Georgia FisherCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
Louise A EllisCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-4578
Andrew GiddyWest Victoria Primary Health Network Geelong Australia.
Carolynn L SmithCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4377-5490
Yvonne ZurynskiCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
Lena SanciUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.
Katherine GrahamWest Victoria Primary Health Network Geelong Australia.
Naomi WhiteWest Victoria Primary Health Network Geelong Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteCentre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Sydney Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0296-4957

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged primary care to rapidly innovate. In response, the Western Victorian Primary Health Network (WVPHN) developed a COVID-19 online Community of Practice comprising general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, pharmacists, aged care and disability workers, health administrators, public health experts, medical specialists, and consumers. This Experience Report describes our progress toward a durable organizational learning health system (LHS) model through the COVID-19 pandemic crisis and beyond. Methods: In March 2020, we commenced weekly Community of Practice sessions, adopting the Project ECHO (Extension of Community Health Outcomes) model for a virtual information-sharing network that aims to bring clinicians together to develop collective knowledge. Our work was underpinned by the LHS framework proposed by Menear et al. and aligned with Kotter's eight-step change model. Results: There were four key phases in the development of our LHS: build a Community of Practice; facilitate iterative change; develop supportive organizational infrastructure; and establish a sustainable, ongoing LHS. In total, the Community of Practice supported 83 unique COVID-19 ECHO sessions involving 3192 h of clinician participation and over 10 000 h of organizational commitment. Six larger sessions were run between March 2020 and September 2022 with 3192 attendances. New models of care and care pathways were codeveloped in sessions and network leaders contributed to the development of guidelines and policy advice. These innovations enabled WVPHN to lead the Australian state of Victoria on rates of COVID vaccine uptake and GP antiviral prescribing. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic created a sense of urgency that helped stimulate a regional primary care-based Community of Practice and LHS. A robust theoretical framework and established change management theory supported the purposeful implementation of our LHS. Reflection on challenges and successes may provide insights to support the implementation of LHS models in other primary care settings.

Indexed as

change managementCommunity of PracticeCOVID‐19crisiscrisis managementlearning healthcare systemslearning health systemprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40247896
PMCPMC12000756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.