Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247888›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Contribution of investment in health and cancer control to economic growth in Commonwealth countries.

Rifat Atun, Jan Ludwig Fries, Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte, Malina Müller, Dennis Ostwald, Maike Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rifat AtunDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jan Ludwig FriesWifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.
Karla Hernandez-VillafuerteWifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.
Malina MüllerWifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.
Dennis OstwaldWifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.
Maike SchmittWifor Institute, Rheinstraße 22, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There are three broad mechanisms through which health investments yield economic benefits. First, health investments in cost-effective innovations help improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs in a health system. Second, investments in health can help improve health and wellbeing of individuals. A healthier population is economically more productive, with a longer productive life and reduced absenteeism and presenteeism. Third, an important but often-overlooked mechanism is the benefit of health investments on the broader economy through influences on supply and demand across various other sectors of a country's economy. We examine the third mechanism in selected Commonwealth countries. Methods: We provide an analysis and estimates of GVA growth and employment effects of the Health Economy for four Commonwealth countries, namely India, Nigeria, Malaysia and the United Kingdom in 2022. Drawing on a conservative 'static estimation approach', whose bases are on the Health Economy Reporting, to provide country-specific assessment of the return on investment in cancer services and cancer prevention in the UK, for which data are available, as an illustrative 'use case'. For cancer prevention, we examine investments in vaccination for Human Papilloma Virus. Findings: In our analysis, the Gross Value Added (GVA) generated by the Health Economy in the UK amounted to about US$295 billion (8.9% of GDP; the largest sector by size) in 2022, with around US$171 billion of GVA (5.2% of GDP) generated in adjacent sectors, and through these two effects generating additional induced consumption of US$217 billion of GVA (6.6% of GDP). In India, Malaysia, and Nigeria, in 2022, total GVA generated by the Health Economy, adjacent sectors and through induced income accounted for 9.9%, 9.8% and 7.0% of the GDP respectively. In the UK, US$134 million of investment in HPV vaccination generated US$247 million of GVA in total and 2000 jobs. Whereas in India US$756 million of investment in HPV vaccination produced US$ 1149 million in total GVA and generated 155,000 jobs. Interpretation: The assessment of four Commonwealth countries reveals that the Health Economy contributes substantially to economic growth and generates substantial employment. These contributions extend beyond the health sector itself, reaching adjacent sectors along the health value chain and inducing effects throughout the broader economy. Investment in cancer prevention generates high returns with substantial addictions to GVA and employment. Funding: No external funding. Self-funded by Harvard University and Wifor Institute.

Indexed as

CancerCommonwealth countriesHealth economicsHealth economyHealth systemsInvestment in health

Identifiers

PMID40247888
PMCPMC12005225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.