ArticleUrology research & practice2025
Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Improves the Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Efficiency and safety of transperineal prostate biopsy with a single access point].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Detection Rates of Prostate Cancer Across Prostatic Zones Using Freehand Single-Access Transperineal Fusion Biopsies.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Freehand transperineal prostate biopsy (fTP-Bx) has been established as an alternative within the transperineal approach for prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis. The primary objective was to compare the rate of overall CaP detection and clinically significant (greater than or equal to International Society of Urological Pathology 2) in patients with biopsy-naive between freehand transperineal prostate biopsy (fTP-Bx) and transperineal grid biopsy (TP-Bx) techniques. The secondary objective was to show the characteristics of the procedure and measure the associated complications. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent fTP-Bx (n: 326) and TP-Bx (n: 118) in our department was conducted between October 2020 and May 2023 due to suspected CaP based on elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), suspicious digital rectal examination, or those under active surveillance protocol. The chisquare test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Results: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent fTP-Bx (n: 326) and TP-Bx (n: 118) in our department was conducted between October 2020 and May 2023 due to suspected CaP based on elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), suspicious digital rectal examination, or those under active surveillance protocol. The chisquare test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare categorical variables. Conclusion: Freehand transperineal prostate biopsy achieved a higher rate of clinically significant CaP detection than TP-Bx in biopsy-naive patients, accompanied by a lower number of postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.