ArticleCancer medicine2025
Sick Leave due to Stress and Subsequent Cancer Risk, a Swedish National Registry Study of 516,678 Cancer Cases.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiation effects research foundation-a view to the future.Carcinogenesis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined whether sick leave due to severe stress (stress leave) and duration of leave are associated with future cancer risk.
methodsWe conducted a matched case-control study using complete-population data from Swedish national registers (2005 to 2018), including 516,678 primary cancer cases and 2,357,433 matched controls. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by conditional logistic regression and adjusted for pre-specified confounders.
resultsStress leave of any duration, reported to the Swedish Social Insurance Register, was associated with a slightly increased cancer risk, with the highest risk estimate for 1-30 versus 0 days (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09). In men, a clear exposure-response trend was present. We observed increased risks of prostate cancer (adjusted OR for > 90 days: 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) and cervical cancer (adjusted OR for > 90 days: 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.17, including cancer in situ). In etiology-based analyses, a positive association was found for smoking-related cancers, and the risk relationship for non-cervical HPV-related cancers was similar to that for cervical cancer. Risk estimates were above one for several types of stress in relation to overall cancer risk, including an exposure-response trend for acute stress reactions (p-trend 4.0 × 10
conclusionsStress leave was associated with a modestly higher risk of cancer overall and prostate and cervical cancers specifically. Regardless of whether the link is biological or reflective of lifestyle mediators or for cervical cancer, lower participation in screening, these findings suggest a potential relevance of severe stress for cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.