Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247756›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025

Application of water safety planning to improve drinking water safety in an Arctic community - a case study in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.

Caroline Duncan, Elan Chalmers, Stephanie Gora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline DuncanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-0008-0981
Elan ChalmersDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephanie GoraDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water safety planning is a risk management approach that accounts for quantitative and qualitative drinking water hazards and includes ongoing input from stakeholders. This approach has been applied in jurisdictions across the world including Canada. Rural and remote communities in Canada, impacted by water safety, stand to benefit most from holistic approaches to water safety risk management such as water safety planning. Unfortunately, these communities typically have limited resources to engage in this approach. Additionally, most remote communities rely on truck and cistern water systems, which have less understood hazards than communities in Canada with piped service. In this study, we report the results of an initial water safety planning case study in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut. We identified numerous water quality hazards including disinfection byproducts in trucks, manganese in the source water, and copper in tap water, as well as operational challenges that increase the risk of water emergencies in the community. We conclude that water safety planning has the potential to substantially improve water safety in Nunavut but current information gaps as well as complex stakeholder interactions are likely to hinder top-down attempts. A dynamic and inclusive approach is recommended that incorporates a targeted exploration of water safety hazards.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterRisk ManagementWater QualityWater SupplyArctic RegionsHumansNunavutDrinking WaterArctic water systemsdrinking waterRisk managementWater qualitywater safety

Identifiers

PMID40247756
PMCPMC12010652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.