Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247718›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

In vitro wound healing effects of postbiotics derived from the gut microbiota of long-lived blind mole rats, a model of healthy ageing.

Hazal K Demirhan, Zeynep B Aksoy, Basar Karaca, Teoman Kankilic, Kamil C Akcali, Fadime Kiran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmaceutics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Integration of Postbiotics into Adult Diapers:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. In vitro wound healing effects of postbiotics derived from the gut microbiota of long-lived blind mole rats, a model of healthy ageing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hazal K DemirhanPharmabiotic Technologies Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5188-7698
Zeynep B AksoyStem Cell Institute, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Basar KaracaMicrobiology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Teoman KankilicDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey.
Kamil C AkcaliStem Cell Institute, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fadime KiranPharmabiotic Technologies Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-2959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds represent a global public health burden to patients and healthcare professionals worldwide. Considering the unmet need for safe and effective therapeutic approaches for wound healing, research on discovering new bioactive materials that support all stages of wound healing is gaining importance. In this study, the wound-healing activity of postbiotics obtained from Limosilactobacillus reuteri EIR/Spx-2, isolated from the gut microbiota of long-lived blind mole rats (Nannospalax xanthodon), was investigated. Our results demonstrated that postbiotics exhibited a strong inhibitory effect against important skin pathogens, eliminated their biofilm formation, and downregulated the expression of genes involved in their quorum-sensing regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, treatment with postbiotics resulted in a significant increase (23.82% ± 2.11%) in L929 fibroblast cell proliferation. Additionally, postbiotics applied on scratched fibroblast monolayer significantly accelerated the re-epithelialization by 66.78% ± 3.74%. The treatment also increased the mRNA expression and protein levels of COL1A1 in the early healing phase. Moreover, the intracellular ROS levels of L929 cells suppressed by H

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLimosilactobacillus reuteriWound HealingAgingAnimalsBiofilmsCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalFibroblastsMiceMole RatsProbioticsRatsbiofilmsinfectioninflammation Limosilactobacillus reuteripostbioticsproliferationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID40247718
PMCPMC12006833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.