Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247692›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of andrology2026

Advancements in penile lengthening techniques concurrent with penile prosthesis placement: a narrative review.

Mattia Lo Re, Manuel Alonso Isa, Esther Garcia Rojo, Celeste Manfredi, Agustin Fraile Poblador, Marta Pezzoli, Andrea Cocci, Francesco Sessa, Andrea Minervini, Javier Romero-Otero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Update on penile prosthesis.Asian journal of andrology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mattia Lo ReDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, 50100, Italy.
Manuel Alonso IsaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital HM Puerta Del Sur, HM Sanchinarro, Hospitals Health Research Institute and ROC Clinic, Madrid 28010, Spain.
Esther Garcia RojoDepartment of Urology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Hospitals Health Research Institute HM Hospitales and ROC Clinic, Madrid 28010, Spain.
Celeste ManfrediUrology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Italy.
Agustin Fraile PobladorDepartment of Urology, University Hospital HM Rivas, Hospitals Health Research Institute HM Hospitales and ROC Clinic, Madrid 28010, Spain.
Marta PezzoliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, 50100, Italy.
Andrea CocciUnit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence 50100, Italy.
Francesco SessaUnit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence 50100, Italy.
Andrea MinerviniUnit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence 50100, Italy.
Javier Romero-OteroDepartment of Urology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Hospitals Health Research Institute HM Hospitales and ROC Clinic, Madrid 28010, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile prosthetic devices stand as the foremost solution for medication-resistant erectile dysfunction. Frequently, medical conditions triggering erectile dysfunction also led to penile shortening, detrimentally impacting patients' quality of life. This narrative review aims to explore and evaluate the various techniques available for penile lengthening that can be performed concurrently with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion. We conducted a comprehensive examination of the literature, utilizing PubMed focusing on key terms such as "penile prosthesis corporal length", "inflatable penile prosthesis and short penis", and "buried penis". The review identified several advanced methodologies for preserving and enhancing penile length during IPP insertion. These techniques include subcoronal IPP insertion, sliding technique, modified sliding technique, multiple slice technique, and circumferential incision with grafting. Supplementary procedures aimed at improving the perception of increased length involve ventral phalloplasty and suprapubic lipectomy. It is worth noting that the maximum length gain seems to be constrained by the length of the neurovascular bundles. In summary, the evidence available in the literature is limited due to the short of case series reported, lack of randomized controlled trials, and heterogeneity of the studies. The literature suggests that for carefully selected patients, surgical penile lengthening procedures performed concurrently with IPP insertion emerge as effective treatments for individuals grappling with penile shortening and severe erectile dysfunction. Well-designed, larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of these procedures.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisPenisHumansMaleburied penisinflatable penile prosthesispenile fibrosisshort penis

Identifiers

PMID40247692
PMCPMC12912750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.