Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247660›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

ERCnet: Phylogenomic Prediction of Interaction Networks in the Presence of Gene Duplication.

Evan S Forsythe, Tony C Gatts, Linnea E Lane, Chris deRoux, Monica J Berggren, Elizabeth A Rehmann, Emily N Zak, Trinity Bartel, Luna A L'Argent, Daniel B Sloan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correlated Gene Copy Number Changes in a Seminal Fluid Protein Network inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Plant MutS2 proteins function in plastid ribosome quality control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evan S ForsytheDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-2245
Tony C GattsDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-3029-8932
Linnea E LaneBiology Program, Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4154-806X
Chris deRouxDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4806-2940
Monica J BerggrenDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-2541-237X
Elizabeth A RehmannBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Program, Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-9184-4362
Emily N ZakBiology Program, Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.
Trinity BartelBiology Program, Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-4305-4289
Luna A L'ArgentBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Program, Oregon State University-Cascades, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8249-2712
Daniel B SloanDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-0897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assigning gene function from genome sequences is a rate-limiting step in molecular biology research. A protein's position within an interaction network can potentially provide insights into its molecular mechanisms. Phylogenetic analysis of evolutionary rate covariation (ERC) in protein sequence has been shown to be effective for large-scale prediction of functional relationships and interactions. However, gene duplication, gene loss, and other sources of phylogenetic incongruence are barriers for analyzing ERC on a genome-wide basis. Here, we developed ERCnet, a bioinformatic program designed to overcome these challenges, facilitating efficient all-versus-all ERC analyses for large protein sequence datasets. We simulated proteome datasets and found that ERCnet achieves combined false positive and negative error rates well below 10% and that our novel "branch-by-branch" length measurements outperforms "root-to-tip" approaches in most cases, offering a valuable new strategy for performing ERC. We also compiled a sample set of 35 angiosperm genomes to test the performance of ERCnet on empirical data, including its sensitivity to user-defined analysis parameters such as input dataset size and branch-length measurement strategy. We investigated the overlap between ERCnet runs with different species samples to understand how species number and composition affect predicted interactions and to identify the protein sets that consistently exhibit ERC across angiosperms. Our systematic exploration of the performance of ERCnet provides a roadmap for design of future ERC analyses to predict functional interactions in a wide array of genomic datasets. ERCnet code is freely available at https://github.com/EvanForsythe/ERCnet.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationSoftwareComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularGenomicsMagnoliopsidaPhylogenycoevolutionevolutionary rate covariationinteraction networksinteractomeprotein interactions

Identifiers

PMID40247660
PMCPMC12062884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.