ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Association of A1AT With Poor Functional Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- uPAR and cFn as candidate protein biomarkers for identifying low response to rtPA in acute ischemic stroke.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate whether A1AT (α-1 antitrypsin) bloodstream levels, measured acutely after ischemic stroke, can predict the outcome of patients with stroke. METHODS AND
resultsTwo cohorts of patients with stroke were studied independently and retrospectively: a pilot cohort of 59 patients and a larger replicative study with 527 patients. Blood samples were drawn at hospital admission (<6 hours after stroke onset) before any treatment was given. A1AT levels were analyzed. Patients were followed after the event, and functional outcomes were evaluated at in-hospital (discharge) and midterm (third month) follow-up according to the modified Rankin Scale (considering modified Rankin Scale score >2 a poor outcome). Association studies between A1AT levels and functional outcomes were conducted. We also evaluated the added value of A1AT as a prognostic biomarker over the clinical model (sex, age, premorbid modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores) with the likelihood ratio test. In both studies, the levels of A1AT were higher in patients who had worse outcomes, were older, and had higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores at admission. In the pilot study, higher levels of A1AT were also associated with death at discharge and at 3 months after stroke (
conclusionsBased on our data, we cannot claim that A1AT is an independent biomarker of ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, A1AT is potentially involved in stroke outcomes and might be explored as a potential therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.