ReviewBiophysical journal2025
Functional asymmetry in processivity clamp proteins.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-Range Destabilizing Effects of Mutations at theBiochemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symmetric homo-oligomeric proteins comprising multiple copies of identical subunits are abundant in all domains of life. To fulfill their biological function, these complexes undergo conformational changes, binding events, or posttranslational modifications, leading to loss of symmetry. Processivity clamp proteins that encircle DNA and play multiple roles in DNA replication and repair are archetypical homo-oligomeric symmetric protein complexes. The symmetrical nature of processivity clamps enables simultaneous interactions with multiple protein binding partners; such interactions result in asymmetric changes that facilitate the transition between clamp loading and DNA replication and between DNA replication and repair. The ring-shaped processivity clamps are opened and loaded onto DNA by clamp-loader complexes via asymmetric intermediates with one of the intermonomer interfaces disrupted, undergo spontaneous opening events, and bind heterogeneous partners. Eukaryotic clamp proteins are subject to ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, and acetylation, affecting their biological functions. There is increasing evidence of the functional asymmetry of the processivity clamp proteins from structural, biophysical, and computational studies. Here, we review the symmetry and asymmetry of processivity clamps and their roles in regulating the various functions of the clamps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.