Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Pain and Anxiety Levels During Dental Restorations in Primary Molars: INJEX Needleless System vs Traditional Syringe.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07426523 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Needle-Free Infiltration Anesthesia in Alleviating Dental Pain and Anxiety Among Children During Local Anesthesia. Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Needle-Free Infiltration Anesthesia in Alleviating Dental Pain and Anxiety Among Children During Local Anesthesia. Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fear of discomfort can affect children's behavior. This study aimed to compare pain and anxiety levels of children undergoing dental restoration using a conventional technique and INJEX. MATERIAL AND METHODS A split-mouth, randomized controlled study was conducted on 25 children aged between 7 to 10 years. Children who required restoration were randomly allocated to one of the 2 groups: Group I (traditional system) and Group II (INJEX) [25 teeth in each group]. Following standard behavior guidance, a single operator delivered anesthesia. After 3 minutes, the restoration was performed. Pain intensity was assessed using Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) and Wong-Baker Faces Rating Pain scale (WBS), while child behavior was assessed using the Frankl Behavior Rating scale (FBRS). RESULTS Significant differences (P value <0.001) were observed between the 2 groups when the FLACC scores were analyzed during the administration of local anesthesia. There was a notable difference (P value <0.001) found in the WBS scores before and after injection, among which higher scores [4(2,6)] were observed in the traditional system group. CONCLUSIONS INJEX technique manifested benefits in the form of reduction in pain intensity levels felt by children, and their attitudes remained positive throughout the restorative procedure, which improve the experiences of both the child and the dental practitioner. The INJEX system could be a versatile alternative to the conventional technique. INJEX can be used to reduce preoperative fear and postoperative pain and the amount of anesthesia delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.