ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2025
Clinicians' Experiences of Delivering Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Ten (CBT-T): A Qualitative Investigation.
Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Site Study of Brief Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders for Individuals With BMI ≥ 30.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCognitive Behaviour Therapy Ten (CBT-T) is a relatively new manualised treatment for non-underweight patients with eating disorders. It has been found to be an effective treatment and to be rated highly by patients. However, it is also important to consider clinicians' perspectives in the implementation and development of new interventions, because clinician perspectives can impact treatment delivery, leading to issues such as therapist drift. Using a qualitative approach, this research aimed to examine clinician experiences of delivering CBT-T.
methodThe sample consisted of 13 clinicians currently delivering CBT-T, with at least six months experience of delivering this treatment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Microsoft Teams, using thematic analysis to identify themes from the interview transcripts.
resultsThree themes and 10 subthemes were identified. The main themes were: positive experiences of delivering CBT-T, changing experience over time, and challenges in delivery. DISCUSSION: Clinicians reported an overall largely positive experience of delivering CBT-T, with some challenges related to treatment delivery identified. Findings are discussed in relation to wider research literature, with recommendations given about how clinicians can be supported with their delivery of CBT-T, and for future research and CBT-T development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.