ArticleBMC psychology2025
The role of cognitive control in the interaction of the SNARC and MARC effects.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many studies have identified two types of spatial congruency effects in number parity judgment tasks: the SNARC effect (Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes), related to numerical magnitude, and the MARC effect (Linguistic Markedness Association of Response Codes), associated with parity. Although previous work has found that these effects interact, the mechanisms underlying the interaction are unclear. Previous studies have investigated the effect of linguistic connections on the activation of the SNARC and MARC effects in right-to-left readers by manipulating the time interval between tasks. We propose that a cognitive control mechanism mediates this phenomenon, with the level of cognitive conflict induced by the MARC effect under varying conditions being a critical factor in influencing spatial-numerical associations. We first performed four behavioral experiments manipulating time intervals between parity-to-response mappings. The results demonstrate that interactions between the SNARC and MARC effects are not sensitive to changes in time intervals but are primarily influenced by the congruency between the two effects. We then performed an event related potentials study. The response patterns observed in the P300 component support the hypothesis that cognitive conflict levels influence spatial-numerical associations. In conclusion, this study highlights the essential role of cognitive control in modulating the conflict between the SNARC and MARC effects, providing a new theoretical perspective on the dynamic characteristics of spatial-numerical associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.