ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025
Co-creating community initiatives on physical activity and healthy eating in a low-income neighbourhood in Quito, Ecuador.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Promoting healthy behaviours to improve population health requires strategies that foster supportive environments and actively engage communities. Here, we detail an evidence-informed co-creation process in Ferroviaria, a low-income neighbourhood in Quito, Ecuador, led by six members of a local Women's Association. Co-creation here involved a participatory approach that integrated local epidemiological data on non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors and employed the "Dialogue Forum" methodology to guide collective decision-making. Through this process, community leaders and participants prioritized initiatives based on community needs, ultimately choosing to develop a community food garden. This initiative fostered social confidence, empowerment, and cohesion, though challenges emerged, including limited participation in the evaluation phase and difficulties in sustaining actions post-implementation. We demonstrate how the "Dialogue Forum" can be an effective tool for inclusive decision-making in low-resource settings. For future co-creation efforts, we underscore the importance of building strong local networks and implementing strategies to prevent dominance by either community leaders or researchers within the co-creation process. Initiatives should incorporate comprehensive community-led evaluations, and it is critical for community leaders to understand the importance of developing actions that the community can independently lead and sustain without continued institutional support. When health data is used, it should be framed to emphasize contextual determinants rather than focusing solely on behavioural risk factors. This report contributes to the growing evidence on community-driven health interventions, positioning co-creation as a pathway to social change and enhanced public health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.