ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Deep-learning network for automated evaluation of root-canal filling radiographic quality.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in periapical radiography: a systematic review.Odontology · 2026Pooled it
- Use of artificial intelligence for detection of MB2 canals in maxillary first molars on CBCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Readiness of Artificial Intelligence Models for MB2 Canal Detection in Maxillary Molars: A Scoping Review.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Loop Detection: A Panoramic Radiography Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Test Characteristics of a Prototype for AI-Assisted Radiographic Detection.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Study on the reproducibility of the Frankfort horizontal plane based on CBCT 3D reconstruction and comparative analysis with lateral radiographs.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Endodontic Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluation: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Improving Endodontic Radiograph Interpretation with TV-CLAHE for Enhanced Root Canal Detection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep-learning networks are promising techniques in dentistry. This study developed and validated a deep-learning network, You Only Look Once (YOLO) v5, for the automatic evaluation of root-canal filling quality on periapical radiographs.
methodsYOLOv5 was developed using 1,008 periapical radiographs (training set: 806, validation set: 101, testing set: 101) from one center and validated on an external data set of 500 periapical radiographs from another center. We compared the network's performance with that of inexperienced endodontist in terms of recall, precision, F1 scores, and Kappa values, using the results from specialists as the gold standard. We also compared the evaluation durations between the manual method and the network.
resultsOn the external test data set, the YOLOv5 network performed better than inexperienced endodontist in terms of overall comprehensive performance. The F1 index values of the network for correct and incorrect filling were 92.05% and 82.93%, respectively. The network outperformed the inexperienced endodontist in all tooth regions, especially in the more difficult-to-assess upper molar regions. Notably, the YOLOv5 network evaluated images 150-220 times faster than manual evaluation.
conclusionsThe YOLOv5 deep learning network provided clinicians with a new, relatively accurate and efficient auxiliary tool for assessing the radiological quality of root canal fillings, enhancing work efficiency with large sample sizes. However, its use should be complemented by clinical expertise for accurate evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.