Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247388›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Functional outcomes following minimally invasive Achilles rupture repair: a retrospective comparative study of PARS and midsubstance speedbridge techniques.

John J Peabody, Steven M Hadley, Rachel Bergman, Sarah J Westvold, Fikayo O Olamigoke, Shaun Chang, Milap Patel, Anish R Kadakia

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John J PeabodyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Steven M HadleyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rachel BergmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sarah J WestvoldYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Fikayo O OlamigokeNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shaun ChangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Milap PatelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anish R KadakiaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Akadaki1@nm.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies have compared patient-reported outcomes between open repair and one of either the two minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon rupture: Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) and Midsubstance Speedbridge Implant System (MSB). However, no study has compared patient-reported outcomes measured by Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and PROMIS pain interference (PI) and the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) between PARS and MSB. Our study compared patient-reported outcomes measured by PROMIS and ATRS scores between PARS and MSB. We hypothesized that patient-reported outcomes would be similar between groups.

methodsThis was a retrospective review of 434 patients who underwent Achilles rupture repair from 2018 to 2023 at a single institution. Tendinopathies, open injuries, concomitant fractures, tendon transfers, gastrocnemius recessions, and open repairs were excluded. A total of 316 patients met inclusion criteria and were contacted to complete a postoperative questionnaire containing PROMIS and ATRS. 119 (78 PARS and 41 MSB) completed all surveys and were included for final analysis. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in mean scores. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare incidence of complications. All tests were conducted at a significance level of α = 0.05.

resultsAverage follow-up was 30 months at time of survey completion. There were no significant differences in PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS measures between groups (p > 0.05). Mean PARS PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS were 58.8, 44.2, and 86.0, respectively. Mean MSB PROMIS PF, PROMIS PI, and ATRS were 55.3, 44.0, and 82.5, respectively. No significant differences existed in incidence of each postoperative complication between groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionIn the largest study to compare patient-reported outcomes between PARS and MSB, outcomes were similar between both groups. Both techniques resulted in PROMIS PF greater than the population mean and PROMIS PI lower than the population mean. Each had similar ATRS scores. Overall, both MSB and PARS were safe and effective strategies for surgically managing Achilles ruptures.

Indexed as

Achilles TendonMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTendon InjuriesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesRuptureTreatment OutcomeAchillesAchilles tendon ruptureAchilles tendon rupture repairMinimally invasive surgeryPARSPatient-reported outcomesPROMISSpeedbridge

Identifiers

PMID40247388
PMCPMC12007249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.