ArticleBMC public health2025
Development and validation of an instrument to evaluate school-health implementation: a sequential mixed-methods approach.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComprehensive School Health (CSH) is an internationally recognized approach that transforms the whole school environment and culture of the school, while wholistically addressing school health. Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of taking a CSH approach to support the creation of health-enhancing behaviors among students while also improving educational outcomes. Despite its effectiveness, there is currently a lack of evaluative tools for schools and school authorities (i.e., school districts, divisions, boards) to measure wholistic shifts in school culture and the conditions present to support implementation.
methodsUsing a sequential mixed-methods approach, we developed and piloted a tool for use by schools and school authorities to plan and evaluate their CSH efforts using the previously established Essential Conditions for taking a CSH Approach. Phase 1 utilized a qualitative, participatory approach to develop the tool and assess face and content validity. Phase 2 utilized a quantitative approach to pilot test and examine the construct validity, and internal consistency of the instrument.
resultsPhase 1 results provide evidence of content/face validity for the instrument, with Phase 2 providing promising results indicating high reliability of many of the survey items and mixed results for construct validity, likely due to sample size limitations. At the school level all but one Essential Condition reached an acceptable level of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha less than 0.70), and six of eight Essential Conditions at the school-authority level met the acceptable threshold value. At the school level, standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) values for all but one Essential Condition indicated a good fit; at the school-authority level, SRMR values for six of eight Essential Conditions indicated a good fit. As most analyses did not produce chi-square estimates, model fitting results are interpreted with caution.
conclusionsThis study adds to the existing knowledge base for CSH implementation, through the development of a user-friendly evaluative tool for ongoing data collection related to healthy school community process indicators, with encouraging pilot results. This has important practical application and can benefit the broad adoption, scaling, and long-term evaluation of interventions taking a CSH approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.