ArticleBMC surgery2025
Surgical success in obstetric fistula repair and associated factors: findings from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of facilitators, barriers and adaptations for provision of obstetric fistula surgery and care: a qualitative descriptive study of service providers in selected hospitals in Busoga sub-region, eastern Uganda.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Epidemiological profile, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes of genital fistula repair in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: FisPro DRC Experience.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstetric fistulas are common in low-resourced settings, but the factors associated with successful repair remain unclear in Zambia. We assessed the socio-demographics, fistula characteristics, and healthcare factors associated with successful obstetric fistula repair outcomes in Zambia.
methodsOur retrospective cohort study was based on the Zambia Fistula Foundation Treatment Network's clinical database, including 1439 women who underwent obstetric fistula surgical repairs at hospitals in Zambia between 2017 and 2023. Tanahashi's Health Services Coverage framework guided the selection of potential factors associated with successful obstetric fistula repair outcomes. We employed Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) before conducting logistic regression analyses. Univariable models, a multivariable model, and marginal probabilities were then fitted to examine the associations between successful obstetric fistula repair outcome, a fistula that is closed and dry, and relevant covariates.
resultsOur results showed an overall fistula repair success rate of 88.1%. Patients from the Northern and Muchinga provinces showed 51% (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.27, 0.90) lower odds of surgical repair success compared to those from Central and Lusaka provinces. Patients with a previous fistula repair had 47% lower odds of success (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.87) than those without. Finally, surgeries rated intermediate in difficulty had 64% (AOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.70), and those rated difficult had 90% (AOR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.21) lower odds of success than simple repairs.
conclusionWe identified geographic location, previous repair history, and surgical complexity as the factors associated with successful obstetric fistula repair outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.