ArticleBMC public health2025
YouTube and TikTok as sources of information on acute pancreatitis: a content and quality analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- TikTok, RedNote, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-platform content analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Assessing the quality of general anesthesia-related short videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Assessing the content and quality of deep vein thrombosis on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study.Thrombosis journal · 2026Article
- Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of HPV-related medical information: a cross-sectional content analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of sarcopenia-related videos on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality evaluation of health science popularization short videos related to cerebrovascular diseases on popular short video platforms in China: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu as sources of information on frailty: Cross-sectional content analysis study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs one of the leading causes of hospitalization and huge medical expenses for gastrointestinal disorders, morbidity and mortality of acute pancreatitis continue to rise globally. Short videos are an important medium for population to achieve information about acute pancreatitis. We aimed to evaluate the content and quality of acute pancreatitis-related videos on TikTok and YouTube.
methodA search was performed on the TikTok and YouTube platforms using the keyword "Acute pancreatitis". The sources of the videos were categorized as academic institutions, national institutions, physicians, healthcare professionals other than physicians, health information websites and others. The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), Global Quality Scale (GQS), and modified DISCERN scores were used to assess the quality of the included videos.
resultA total of 75 TikTok videos and 79 YouTube videos were included and analyzed. Regarding modified DISCERN scale, the videos from national institutions scored highest on TikTok (p = 0.020). As for YouTube, healthcare professionals other than physicians had the highest averaged score judged by GQS score and JAMA score (p = 0.016 for JAMA score, p = 0.020 for GQS score). The duration of the videos on TikTok are significantly shorter than that on YouTube (71.5 vs. 361, respectively; p < 0.01). The length of the video was associated with higher JAMA score and DISCERN score (p < 0.01, r = 0.635 and 0.207, respectively).
conclusionAccording to TikTok and YouTube, basic information about acute pancreatitis was the main presentation of the videos. We recommend that video producers extend the length of their videos appropriately to flesh out the content, and national institutions, physicians, and healthcare professionals other than physicians are all great resource of getting to know the acute pancreatitis better for viewers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.