ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring the influence of artificial intelligence integration on personalized learning: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate medical students in the United Kingdom.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of ChatGPT-assisted personalized learning on teaching acute abdomen to undergraduate medical students: A randomized crossover study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Mapping Personalized Learning in Medical Education: A Meta-Synthesis of Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026Review
- Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Graduate Medical Students Regarding AI in Syria: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Blending Artificial Intelligence with Expertise: A Comparative Study of Concept Maps in Anatomy Education.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Article
- Determinants of acceptance and usage of generative AI among Chinese medical students: a UTAUT-based empirical investigation.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- AI anxiety and AI dependence among undergraduates: a moderated mediation model of AI self-efficacy and AI literacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Perceptions of AI-based tools among polish medical university students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A research roadmap for AI opportunities in student assessment for medical education.BMC medical education · 2025Review
- AI-enhanced adaptive testing with cognitive diagnostic feedback and its association with performance in undergraduate surgical education: a pilot study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational systems, its potential to revolutionize learning, particularly in content personalization and assessment support, is significant. Personalized learning, supported by AI tools, can adapt to individual learning styles and needs, thus transforming how medical students approach their studies. This study aims to explore the relationship between the use of AI for self-directed learning among undergraduate medical students in the UK and variables such as year of study, gender, and age.
methodsThis cross-sectional study involved a sample of 230 undergraduate medical students from UK universities, collected through an online survey. The survey assessed AI usage in self-directed learning, including students' attitudes towards AI accuracy, perceived benefits, and willingness to mitigate misinformation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear logistic regression to examine associations between AI usage and demographics.
resultsThe analysis revealed that age significantly influenced students' willingness to pay for AI tools (p = 0.012) and gender was linked to concerns about AI inaccuracies (p = 0.017). Female students were more likely to take steps to mitigate risks of misinformation (p = 0.045). The study also found variability in AI usage based on the year of study, with first-year students showing a higher reliance on AI tools.
conclusionAI has the potential to greatly enhance personalized learning for medical students. However, issues surrounding accuracy, misinformation, and equitable access need to be addressed to optimize AI integration in medical education. Further research is recommended to explore the longitudinal effects of AI usage on learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.