Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247306›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Exploring the influence of artificial intelligence integration on personalized learning: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate medical students in the United Kingdom.

Kehinde Sunmboye, Hannah Strafford, Samina Noorestani, Malena Wilison-Pirie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Blending Artificial Intelligence with Expertise: A Comparative Study of Concept Maps in Anatomy Education.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kehinde SunmboyeUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Kehinde.o.sunmboye@uhl-tr.nhs.uk.
Hannah StraffordUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Samina NoorestaniUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Malena Wilison-PirieUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into educational systems, its potential to revolutionize learning, particularly in content personalization and assessment support, is significant. Personalized learning, supported by AI tools, can adapt to individual learning styles and needs, thus transforming how medical students approach their studies. This study aims to explore the relationship between the use of AI for self-directed learning among undergraduate medical students in the UK and variables such as year of study, gender, and age.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved a sample of 230 undergraduate medical students from UK universities, collected through an online survey. The survey assessed AI usage in self-directed learning, including students' attitudes towards AI accuracy, perceived benefits, and willingness to mitigate misinformation. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear logistic regression to examine associations between AI usage and demographics.

resultsThe analysis revealed that age significantly influenced students' willingness to pay for AI tools (p = 0.012) and gender was linked to concerns about AI inaccuracies (p = 0.017). Female students were more likely to take steps to mitigate risks of misinformation (p = 0.045). The study also found variability in AI usage based on the year of study, with first-year students showing a higher reliance on AI tools.

conclusionAI has the potential to greatly enhance personalized learning for medical students. However, issues surrounding accuracy, misinformation, and equitable access need to be addressed to optimize AI integration in medical education. Further research is recommended to explore the longitudinal effects of AI usage on learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateSelf-Directed Learning as TopicStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceMedical educationPersonalized learning

Identifiers

PMID40247306
PMCPMC12007362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.