ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Automated machine learning for early prediction of systemic inflammatory response syndrome in acute pancreatitis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early intervention with rescue ERCP and pancreatic stenting for unanticipated post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comparative study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Translational Pharmaco-Nutritional Approaches in the Management of Clinical Acute Pancreatitis-A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiota Characteristics in Acute Pancreatitis Patients and Their Association with SIRS and Organ Failure: An Experimental Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is a frequent and serious complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), often associated with increased mortality. This study aims to leverage automated machine learning (AutoML) algorithms to create a model for the early and precise prediction of SIRS in AP.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with AP across multiple centers from January 2017 to December 2021. Data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Changshu Hospital were used for training and internal validation, while testing was conducted with data from the Second Affiliated Hospital. Predictive models were constructed and validated using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and AutoML. A nomogram was developed based on multivariable logistic regression (LR) analysis, and the performance of the models was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, the AutoML model's effectiveness and interpretability were assessed through DCA, feature importance, SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) plots, and locally interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME).
resultsA total of 1,224 patients were included, with 812 in the training cohort, 200 in validation, and 212 in testing. SIRS occurred in 33.7% of the training cohort, 34.0% in validation, and 22.2% in testing. AutoML models outperformed traditional LR, with the deep learning (DL) model achieving an area under the ROC curve of 0.843 in the training set, and 0.848 and 0.867 in validation and testing, respectively.
conclusionThe AutoML model using the DL algorithm is clinically significant for the early prediction of SIRS in AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.