ReviewFrontiers in zoology2025
Establishing genome sequencing and assembly for non-model and emerging model organisms: a brief guide.
Review in Frontiers in zoology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating evolutionary signals and predicted protein structure reveals localized molecular divergence in Cereus lineages.Genetica · 2026Article
- Beyond the Classics: The Synergy of AI and Genomics Reveals an Expanded Repertoire of Pigmentation Genes.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026Review
- Hybrid Whole-Genome Sequencing ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A chromosome-level genome assembly of the Tristram's Bunting (Emberiza tristrami).Scientific data · 2026Article
- Article
- Establishing single cell RNA transcriptomics: a brief guide.Frontiers in zoology · 2025Review
- Transgene Mapping in Animals: What to Choose?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reference genome assemblies are the basis for comprehensive genomic analyses and comparisons. Due to declining sequencing costs and growing computational power, genome projects are now feasible in smaller labs. De novo genome sequencing for non-model or emerging model organisms requires knowledge about genome size and techniques for extracting high molecular weight DNA. Next to quality, the amount of DNA obtained from single individuals is crucial, especially, when dealing with small organisms. While long-read sequencing technologies are the methods of choice for creating high quality genome assemblies, pure short-read assemblies might bear most of the coding parts of a genome but are usually much more fragmented and do not well resolve repeat elements or structural variants. Several genome initiatives produce more and more non-model organism genomes and provide rules for standards in genome sequencing and assembly. However, sometimes the organism of choice is not part of such an initiative or does not meet its standards. Therefore, if the scientific question can be answered with a genome of low contiguity in intergenic parts, missing the high standards of chromosome scale assembly should not prevent publication. This review describes how to set up an animal genome sequencing project in the lab, how to estimate costs and resources, and how to deal with suboptimal conditions. Thus, we aim to suggest optimal strategies for genome sequencing that fulfil the needs according to specific research questions, e.g. "How are species related to each other based on whole genomes?" (phylogenomics), "How do genomes of populations within a species differ?" (population genomics), "Are differences between populations relevant for conservation?" (conservation genomics), "Which selection pressure is acting on certain genes?" (identification of genes under selection), "Did repeats expand or contract recently?" (repeat dynamics).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.