ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of ultrasound simulation training in intensive care nursing teaching.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing ICU Nurses' Proficiency in Point-of-Care Gastrointestinal Ultrasound: A National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis of nurses in intensive care unit is helpful to improve the quality of nursing care. The traditional ultrasound teaching model has been unable to meet the needs of intensive care. Ultrasound simulation training as a new teaching model can improve the quality and efficiency of teaching. Therefore, the application of ultrasonic simulation training in intensive care ultrasound teaching hopes to improve the technical expertise, proficiency and accuracy of ultrasound use in intensive care nurses.
methodsA total of 40 nurses were divided equally into two groups. Twenty nurses in the control group were taught with the classic teaching method, and 20 nurses in the experimental group were taught with the ultrasound simulation training method. Each nurse practiced for about 15 min each time, three times a week, for a total of 30 days. After training, the theoretical and practical scores of the two groups were compared.
resultThe experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05) including the aspect of the theoretical scores (p < 0.001), practical scores (p < 0.001), and nursing satisfaction rates (p < 0.05).
conclusionsCompared with traditional teaching mode, ultrasonic simulation training is helpful to improve the teaching quality of intensive care nursing, and it can be tried to be applied to ultrasonic training in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.