ArticleBMC medical education2025
A mixed-methods study on the course of professional identity formation in undergraduate medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of Entrustment in Pre-Registration Healthcare Practice-Based Learning: Implications for Dietetics Education.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring early community exposure among first-year medical students in a peripheral Indonesian medical school: a qualitative case study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Supervising for trust in an EPA based curriculum: a focused ethnography of supervisors' entrustment decisions in dental education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Beyond the scalpel: humanistic training and professional identity formation in postgraduate plastic surgery education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development of a continuously updating evidence map in surgical education: study protocol for a living systematic review.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study explored the development of professional identity formation (PIF) in medical students during clinical rotations, focusing on the relationship between self-perceived development and actual development. It examined feedback and evaluations within the entrustable professional activities (EPA) framework, emphasizing the role of formative feedback in fostering professional growth. By analysing students' perceptions of their professional identity and feedback from online portfolios, this study aimed to enhance understanding of the trajectory of PIF.
methodsConducted at the Radboud University, this study focused on medical students in the Master's programme. Sub-study 1 involved administering the extended Professional Self Identity Questionnaire (PSIQ) to 2,095 students from September 2020 to September 2022. Sub-study 2 analysed data from 240 students, integrating PSIQ responses with feedback from their online portfolios, including assessments and supervisor feedback. Data were analysed using SPSS (sub-study 1) and content analysis (sub-study 2) to explore the relationship between self-perceived PIF and actual performance.
resultsA total of 1,519 students completed the extended PSIQ, with exploratory factor analysis confirming the questionnaire's unidimensional structure and improved reliability after adding three items. A one-way ANOVA showed a significant increase in PSIQ scores across different medical programme episodes. In sub-study 2, data of 240 students from three clerkships were analysed for the correlation between self-perceived PIF and actual performance, with no significant differences in their performance on national tests, assessments, or supervisor ratings. Portfolio analysis revealed that supervisors' feedback centred on collaboration, attitude, self-confidence, and growth toward becoming a physician, with students in later clerkships receiving more detailed feedback.
conclusionsThe extended PSIQ, which includes questions about EPAs and clerkship transitions, maintains reliability and construct validity, making it suitable for studying PIF within an EPA-based curriculum. Although no significant differences in performance were found, assertiveness emerged as a key factor in the quality and quantity of feedback, with more assertive students receiving better feedback. Narrative feedback, especially process-oriented, is crucial for supporting professional identity formation in medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.