Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247237›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Self-reported symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and affective lability in discriminating adult ADHD, ASD and their co-occurrence.

Artemios Pehlivanidis, Evangelia-Chrysanthi Kouklari, Eva Kalantzi, Kalliopi Korobili, Evdokia Tagkouli, Katerina Papanikolaou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Artemios Pehlivanidis1st Department of Psychiatry, "Eginition" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece. apechlib@med.uoa.gr.
Evangelia-Chrysanthi Kouklari1st Department of Psychiatry, "Eginition" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Eva Kalantzi1st Department of Psychiatry, "Eginition" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Kalliopi Korobili1st Department of Psychiatry, "Eginition" Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Evdokia TagkouliDepartment of Child Psychiatry, Medical School, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.
Katerina PapanikolaouDepartment of Child Psychiatry, Medical School, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, 11527, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo diagnose and manage adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), or their co-occurrence (ADHD + ASD), clinicians must identify specific features that differentiate these diagnostic categories. Self-report questionnaires targeting specific features are widely used and, together with clinical assessments, provide reliable diagnoses. Although affective lability is present in various psychiatric disorders, it lacks specificity when screening for ADHD in the general population, and its discriminant value for ADHD, ASD, and ADHD + ASD has not been studied.

methodsThis study involved 300 adults without intellectual developmental disorder (188 male) who received an ADHD (n = 174), ASD (n = 68), or ADHD + ASD (n = 58) diagnosis after a multidisciplinary consensus decision according to DSM-5 criteria. Before clinical assessment, all patients requesting evaluation for one of these diagnoses completed questionnaires on an online platform. The assessment instruments included a modified version of the Barkley Adult ADHD Rating Scale (BAARS IV) for ADHD, the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) and the Empathy Quotient (EQ) for ASD features, and the Affective Lability Scale (ALS) for affective lability. Total scores and sub-scores of the instruments were compared among the three groups. Additionally, stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify specific measures that contribute to group discrimination.

resultsResults revealed distinct patterns in symptomatology as expected. The ADHD and the ADHD + ASD groups presented significantly higher ALS total score compared to ASD. Stepwise logistic regression analyses identified specific measures contributing to group differentiation. ASD vs. ADHD + ASD discrimination included BAARS IV current total score and EQ total score. The subscale anger from ALS in addition with BAARS IV past total score and AQ total score were the factors that discriminated ADHD diagnosis from the co-occurrence of ADHD and ASD. Finally, BAARS IV past total score, BAARS IV current inattention, AQ total score, and EQ total score were found to differentiate ADHD from ASD.

conclusionsThe study highlights the significance of incorporating emotional dimensions in diagnostic frameworks and may contribute valuable insights for clinicians differentiating neurodevelopmental conditions.

Indexed as

Affective SymptomsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderAdultComorbidityDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdultsAffective labilityAttention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)Self-report dimensions

Identifiers

PMID40247237
PMCPMC12007368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.