Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247173›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.

Lu Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lu MaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 610 Walnut St, Room 207 A, Madison, 53726, WI, USA. lmao@biostat.wisc.edu.

Funding

Novel Statistical Methods for Complex Time-to-Event Data in Cardiovascular Clinical TrialsR01HL149875 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lu Mao · 2020 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149875NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL149875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe win ratio has been widely used in the analysis of hierarchical composite endpoints, which prioritize critical outcomes such as mortality over nonfatal, secondary events. Although a regression framework exists to incorporate covariates, it is limited to low-dimensional datasets and may struggle with numerous predictors. This gap necessitates a robust variable selection method tailored to the win ratio framework.

methodsWe propose an elastic net-type regularization approach for win ratio regression, extending the proportional win-fractions (PW) model in low-dimensional settings. The method addresses key challenges, including adapting pairwise comparisons to penalized regression, optimizing model selection through subject-level cross-validation, and defining performance metrics via a generalized concordance index. The procedures are implemented in the wrnet R-package, publicly available at https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ .

resultsSimulation studies demonstrate that wrnet outperforms traditional (regularized) Cox regression for time-to-first-event analysis, particularly in scenarios with differing covariate effects on mortality and nonfatal events. When applied to data from the HF-ACTION trial, the method identified prognostic variables and achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to regularized Cox models, as measured by overall and component-specific concordance indices.

conclusionThe wrnet approach combines the interpretability and clinical relevance of the win ratio with the scalability and robustness of elastic net regularization. The accompanying R-package provides a user-friendly interface for routine application of the procedures, whenever appropriate. Future research could explore additional applications or refine the methodology to address non-proportionalities in win-loss risks and nonlinearities in covariate effects.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalProportional Hazards ModelsRegression AnalysisRisk AssessmentConcordance indexElastic netHierarchical composite endpointsLassoProportional win-fractions

Identifiers

PMID40247173
PMCPMC12004665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.