Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247167›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

A comparison of methods for analysing compositional data with fixed and variable totals: a simulation study using the examples of time-use and dietary data.

Georgia D Tomova, Rosemary Walmsley, Laurie Berrie, Michelle A Morris, Peter W G Tennant

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgia D TomovaThe Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK. gtomova@turing.ac.uk.
Rosemary WalmsleyIndependent researcher, Penarth, UK.
Laurie BerrieInstitute of Geography, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK.
Michelle A MorrisThe Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK.
Peter W G TennantThe Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK.

Funding

Alan Turing Institute EP/N510129/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompositional data comprise the parts of a 'whole' (or 'total'), which sum to that 'whole'. The 'whole' may vary between units of analyses, or it may be fixed (constant). For example, total energy intake (a variable total) is the sum of intake from all foods or macronutrients. Total time in a day (a fixed total) is the sum of time spent engaging in various activities. There exist different approaches to analysing compositional data, such as the isocaloric or isotemporal model, ratio variables, and compositional data analysis (CoDA). Although the performance of the different approaches has been compared previously, this has only been conducted in real data. Since the true relationships are unknown in real data, it is difficult to compare model performance in estimating a known effect. We use data simulations of different parametric relationships, to explore and demonstrate the performance of each approach under various possible conditions.

methodsWe simulated physical activity time-use and dietary data as examples of compositional data with fixed and variable totals, respectively, using different parametric relationships between the compositional components and the outcome (fasting plasma glucose): linear, log

resultsThe performance of each approach to analysing compositional data depends on how closely its parameterisation matches the true data generating process. Overall, we demonstrated that the consequences of using an incorrect parameterisation (e.g. using CoDA when the true relationship is linear) are more severe for larger reallocations (e.g. 10-min or 100-kcal) than for 1-unit reallocations. The implications of choosing an unsuitable approach may be starker in compositional data with variable totals. For example, while models with ratio variables are mathematically equivalent to linear models in compositional data with fixed totals, their estimates may be radically different for variable totals.

conclusionsCompositional data with fixed and variable totals behave differently. All existing approaches to analysing such data have utility but need to be carefully selected. Investigators should explore the shape of the relationships between the compositional components and the outcome and chose an approach that matches it best.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDietBlood GlucoseEnergy IntakeExerciseHumansBlood GlucoseCompositional dataCompositional data analysisDietary intakeIsotemporal modelLeave-one-out modelPhysical activityRatio variables

Identifiers

PMID40247167
PMCPMC12004694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.