Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247165›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Clinical burden of Acinetobacter baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, in hospitalized adult patients in the USA between 2018 and 2022.

Thomas P Lodise, Sean T Nguyen, Caroline Margiotta, Bin Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sulbactam-Durlobactam for Carbapenem-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Six Years ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas P LodiseAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA. thomas.lodise@acphs.edu.
Sean T NguyenShionogi Inc, 400 Campus Drive Florham Park, Florham Park, NJ, 07932, USA. sean.nguyen@shionogi.com.
Caroline MargiottaGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Bin CaiShionogi Inc, 400 Campus Drive Florham Park, Florham Park, NJ, 07932, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological data for United States (US) hospitals regarding the burden of Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) are scarce; thus, this study aimed to describe the incidence of A. baumannii and CRAB across US hospitals between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with microbiology data from the PINC AI™ Database. Incidence rates of A. baumannii and CRAB (January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2022) were determined across US hospitals in each census region. Incidence rates of A. baumannii and CRAB were determined at the hospitalization encounter and individual levels. Presence of CRAB was based on non-susceptibility to either doripenem, imipenem, or meropenem. Patient demographics, comorbidities, outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, were compared between patients with CRAB and carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii (CSAB) at the hospitalization encounter level.

resultsDuring the study period, 7,270 hospitalization encounters with ≥ 1 A. baumannii clinical cultures were identified. The overall A. baumannii incidence rate was 1.19 cases per 100 hospitalization encounters and 1.33 cases per 100 unique patients. For CRAB, a total of 2,708 hospitalization encounters were identified, and incidence rate was 0.44 cases per 100 hospitalization encounters. The West South Central, East North Central, and East South Central regions had the highest CRAB incidence rates (0.78, 0.67, and 0.63 cases per 100 hospitalization encounters, respectively). Compared with CSAB, patients with CRAB had significantly more positive cultures with A. baumannii (20.9% vs. 10.0%, respectively, P < 0.0001) and higher prevalence of other Gram-negative pathogens in any clinical culture site within ± 3 days of the index A. baumannii clinical culture (47.2% vs. 42.9%, respectively, P = 0.0004). Patients with CRAB had higher incidences of in-hospital mortality vs. patients with CSAB (20.5% vs. 11.3%, respectively, P < 0.0001).

conclusionsPresence of A. baumannii was identified on a clinical culture in 1% of adult hospitalizations in this multicenter US study. Over a third of A. baumannii hospitalization encounters were CRAB, with the highest incidence rates per 100 hospitalization encounters observed in the most central US regions. Clinicians should consider A. baumannii as a potential pathogen in patients in regions with an increasing incidence rate of A. baumannii.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsAcinetobacter baumanniiCarbapenem resistanceEpidemiologyLength of stayMortality

Identifiers

PMID40247165
PMCPMC12004818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.