Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247112›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2025

Kindness as a public health action.

Tri-Long Nguyen, Ji-Young Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tri-Long NguyenDepartment of Public Health, Section of Epidemiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. long@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6376-7212
Ji-Young LeeDepartment of Public Health, Section for Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current global mental health crisis needs action. Here we show, using empirical evidence of randomised controlled trials combined with Rose's theoretical framework of preventive medicine and epidemiological principles, that the universal practice of kindness is a potentially effective grassroots public health promotion action that could propagate from the individual to the collective. Beyond effectiveness alone, we present medical ethics principles to show that the universal practice of kindness is also relatively costless, socially just, inherently consensual, empowering, and immediately available to, for and within every one of us. We argue that the need for structural changes and future research studies should not justify delaying the individual practice of kindness in our daily lives, since kindness is compatible with research, clinical practice and policy-making.

Identifiers

PMID40247112
PMCPMC12006342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.