ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying biomarkers of sheep welfare using a metabolic discrepancy model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Future Farm project in Western Australia: testing multidisciplinary options for a sheep-crop farming system in a Mediterranean region.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026Article
- Differential expression of microRNAs in the prefrontal cortex as indicators of sheep welfare.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Diet-Microbiome-Redox Interactions and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Livestock: Computational and Spatial Perspectives for Translational Health and Production.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A comparison of normalization methods for the expression of genes associated with oxidative stress in the liver of sheep.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The welfare of an animal is largely determined by the transient state within them that relates to what they experience. We evaluated candidate biomarkers of mental state and experience from human biomedicine as possible welfare biomarkers for sheep using a metabolic energy discrepancy model. The metabolic status of female Merino sheep was altered over three periods to induce changes in their experience and coping capacity. The first group was fed at maintenance for all periods (n = 11); the second group was fed above maintenance in period 1, at maintenance in period 2, and below maintenance in period 3 (n = 12); and the third group was fed below maintenance in period 1, at maintenance in period 2, and above maintenance in period 3 (n = 11). An isolation box test was used at the start and end of each feed period to assess the coping capacity of each sheep. Our results indicated that two of the five candidate biomarkers, insulin-like growth factor 1 and thiol oxidation, were associated with positive and negative experiences in the sheep, respectively. Future research should validate these biomarkers in sheep with other testing paradigms and in other ruminant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.