Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247059›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analyzing the causes of sports injuries in college sports activities and research on the recovery strategy using an intelligent approach.

Zeng Jiao, TaiFu Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zeng JiaoDepartment of Life and Physical Education, Dongshin University, Naju-si, Jeollanam-do, 58245, Republic of Korea.
TaiFu HouDepartment of Sports Medicine, Dongshin University, Naju-si, Jeollanam-do, 58245, Republic of Korea. htf1978@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sports injuries have become a significant concern in modern athletics, particularly among college athletes. These injuries impact athletes' physical health and affect their mental well-being and academic performance. This article explores the various causes of sports injuries in college athletics, shedding light on the high risks involved. After an in-depth analysis, it is evident that factors such as intense training pressure, environmental conditions, psychological challenges, stress, and anxiety contribute significantly to the risk of injuries. This article presents a cutting-edge recovery strategy for intelligent medical treatment to address these challenges. The approach leverages a fuzzy information-based algorithm grounded in similarity measures for spherical fuzzy sets. The proposed method aims to enhance the diagnosis of injuries, design effective rehabilitation programs, and facilitate informed decisions about athletes' return to play. This approach offers valuable insights into improving athletes' health and performance by evaluating similarity measures for spherical fuzzy sets and factoring in injury risks and recovery timelines. The findings demonstrate that integrating traditional medical techniques with advanced algorithmic strategies can significantly reduce recovery time, reduce re-injury risk, and create a more supportive environment for college athletes. The developed assessment algorithm assessed four recovery plans in this study based on four crucial factors. The recovery plan scores are 0.6449, 0.4121, 0.7185, and 0.8215 respectively. The score of the fourth plan is the highest; hence, it is considered the most suitable recovery plan for the athlete.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesAlgorithmsAthletesFuzzy LogicHumansSportsUniversitiesFuzzy aggregationFuzzy decision-makingInjury mitigationMulti-attribute decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40247059
PMCPMC12006464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.