ArticleScientific reports2025
Plantar pressure classification and feature extraction based on multiple fusion algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative efficacy of double and triple arthrodesis in adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a retrospective analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Lower Limb Symmetry Index in Cavus and Normal Feet by Means of a Baropodometric Platform: A Case-Control Study.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Human-centered evaluation of statistical parametric mapping and explainable machine learning for outlier detection in plantar pressure data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Kalman-Based Joint Analysis of IMU and Plantar-Pressure Data During Speed-Skating Slideboard Training.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- TurkerNeXtV2: An Innovative CNN Model for Knee Osteoarthritis Pressure Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using multiple fusion algorithms to optimize the classification and feature extraction of plantar pressure during walking stance phase in healthy people, and explore the diversity of plantar pressure distribution. 243 healthy young male individuals was studied to collect data on plantar impulse and maximum pressure indices from ten distinct regions of the foot during walking. Principal component analysis was utilized to reduce the dimensionality of the data. Optimized clustering and feature extraction algorithms categorized the plantar pressure characteristics and extracted key indicators. Classification discriminant functions were developed using linear discriminant analysis. Analysis of variance compared the differences in features between various plantar pressure distribution patterns. Three types of plantar pressure distribution were identified by multiple fusion algorithms, and four indicators were extracted, including impulses of Toe1, Meta1, Meta5 and Midfoot. The average accuracy rates of original data and cross-validation were 89.70% and 88.50%. Based on one-way analysis of variance, the distribution types were ultimately determined as thumb extension type, midfoot-lateral forefoot push-off type, and normal type. Plantar pressure distribution during walking in healthy people can be categorized into thumb extension type, midfoot-lateral forefoot push-off type, and normal type. Among them, the impulses around the first metatarsophalangeal joint region, fifth metatarsal bone region and midfoot region showed better classification performance. It is recommended that future studies combine the current findings and use prospective studies to further analyze the relationship between gait characteristics and sports injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.