ArticleScientific reports2025
Rapid and robust validation of pooled CRISPR knockout screens using CelFi.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A tumor-associated photoreceptor signature unifies distinct central nervous system malignancies.Cancer cell · 2026Article
- PHIP suppresses NuRD to enable the growth of SWI/SNF-mutant cancers.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Empirical optimization of dual-sgRNA design for in vivo CRISPR/Cas9-mediated exon deletion in mice.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pooled CRISPR screens are vital in the unbiased interrogation of gene function and are instrumental in uncovering therapeutic targets and biological processes. However, follow-up hit validation is critical to confirm observed results. Researchers need a simple and robust approach to rapidly verify putative hits and test resulting observations. Thus, we developed a CRISPR-based method for hit validation that tests the effect of a genetic perturbation on cell fitness. By editing target loci and monitoring the indel profiles over time, we have created a Cellular Fitness (CelFi) assay that can elucidate cellular vulnerabilities and verify hits from pooled CRISPR knockout screens. Unlike traditional cellular fitness assays that evaluate viability over time, the CelFi assay correlates changes in the indel profile at the target gene with a selective growth advantage or disadvantage in individual cells over time. Moreover, the CelFi assay can be utilized to evaluate gene dependencies and test new hypotheses, regardless of variations in single guide RNA optimization, ribonucleoprotein concentration, and gene copy number.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.