Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247012›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2025

Potential downsides of calorie restriction.

Anyongqi Wang, John Roger Speakman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anyongqi WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
John Roger SpeakmanState Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. j.speakman@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-1823

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the potential benefits of calorie restriction on human lifespan remain uncertain, it is currently one of the most extensively researched non-genetic approaches to extending both lifespan and healthspan in animals. Calorie restriction offers numerous health benefits, including a reduced incidence of age-related diseases. However, calorie restriction also produces a range of negative effects, which are not fully documented and require further investigation, particularly in humans. As the viability of calorie restriction in humans will depend on the balance of benefits and detrimental effects, it is crucial to understand the nature of these negative effects and what drives them. In this Review, we summarize the effects of calorie restriction on wound healing, hunger, cold sensitivity, bone health, brain size, cognition, reproductive performance and infection, primarily based on studies of rodents with some data from other species and from humans. Overall, the detrimental effects of calorie restriction seem to stem directly from prioritization of vital functions and downregulation or suppression of energy-demanding processes, which helps preserve survival but can also lead to impaired physiological performance and increased vulnerability to stressors. The exact mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Whether it might be possible to engage in calorie restriction but avoid these negative effects remains uncertain.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionAnimalsCognitionEnergy MetabolismHumansHungerLongevityReproductionWound Healing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.