Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40247001›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Deep learning model DeepNeo predicts neointimal tissue characterization using optical coherence tomography.

Valentin Koch, Olle Holmberg, Edna Blum, Ece Sancar, Alp Aytekin, Masaru Seguchi, Erion Xhepa, Jens Wiebe, Salvatore Cassese, Sebastian Kufner and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Valentin KochInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9678-374X
Olle HolmbergInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Edna BlumGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ece SancarInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.
Alp AytekinGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Masaru SeguchiGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Erion XhepaGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jens WiebeGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Salvatore CasseseGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian KufnerGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thorsten KesslerGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hendrik SagerGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-6553
Felix VollGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-6147
Tobias RheudeGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tobias LenzGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Adnan KastratiGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Heribert SchunkertGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-3001
Julia A SchnabelInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-3009
Michael JonerGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. joner@dhm.mhn.de.
Carsten MarrInstitute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Munich-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany. carsten.marr@helmholtz-munich.de.
Philipp NicolGerman Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate interpretation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) pullbacks is critical for assessing vascular healing after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Manual analysis is time-consuming and subjective, highlighting the need for a fully automated solution.

methodsIn this study, 1148 frames from 92 OCT pullbacks were manually annotated to classify neointima as homogeneous, heterogeneous, neoatherosclerosis, or not analyzable on a quadrant level. Stent and lumen contours were annotated in 305 frames for segmentation of the lumen, stent struts, and neointima. We used these annotations to train a deep learning algorithm called DeepNeo. Performance was further evaluated in an animal model (male New Zealand White Rabbits) of neoatherosclerosis using co-registered histopathology images as the gold standard.

resultsDeepNeo demonstrates a strong classification performance for neointimal tissue, achieving an overall accuracy of 75%, which is comparable to manual classification accuracy by two clinical experts (75% and 71%). In the animal model of neoatherosclerosis, DeepNeo achieves an accuracy of 87% when compared with histopathological findings. For segmentation tasks in human pullbacks, the algorithm shows strong performance with mean Dice overlap scores of 0.99 for the lumen, 0.66 for stent struts, and 0.86 for neointima.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, DeepNeo is the first deep learning algorithm enabling fully automated segmentation and classification of neointimal tissue with performance comparable to human experts. It could standardize vascular healing assessments after PCI, support therapeutic decisions, and improve risk detection for cardiac events.

Identifiers

PMID40247001
PMCPMC12006410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.