In one paragraphArticle in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Martin SeeberDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. seeber@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7891-5636 Matthias StanglDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-0510 Mauricio Vallejo MarteloDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-6895 Uros TopalovicDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4005-7979 Sonja HillerDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3828-8284 Casey H HalpernDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vikram R RaoDepartment of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Itzhak FriedDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5962-2678 Dawn EliashivDepartment of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nanthia SuthanaDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. nanthia@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-3277 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
PMID40246998
PMCPMC12018447
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390