ArticleCommunications biology2025
De novo virulence feature discovery and risk assessment in Klebsiella pneumoniae based on microbial genome vectorization.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Genomic Characterization of High-Risk Multidrug-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, Virulence Factors, and Antibacterial Resistance ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial pathogenicity has traditionally focused on gene-level content with experimentally confirmed functional properties. Hence, significant inferences are made based on similarity to known pathotypes and DNA-based genomic subtyping for risk. Herein, we achieved de novo prediction of human virulence in Klebsiella pneumoniae by expanding known virulence genes with spatially proximal gene discoveries linked by functional domain architectures across all prokaryotes. This approach identified gene ontology functions not typically associated with virulence sensu stricto. By leveraging machine learning models with these expanded discoveries, public genomes were assessed for virulence prediction using categorizations derived from isolation sources captured in available metadata. Performance for de novo strain-level virulence prediction achieved 0.81 F1-Score. Virulence predictions using expanded "discovered" functional genetic content were superior to that restricted to extant virulence database content. Additionally, this approach highlighted the incongruence in relying on traditional phylogenetic subtyping for categorical inferences. Our approach represents an improved deconstruction of genome-scale datasets for functional predictions and risk assessment intended to advance public health surveillance of emerging pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.