ArticleScientific reports2025
Vocal and articulatory speech control deficits in individuals with post-stroke aphasia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of attentional instructions on neural and behavioral correlates of vocal auditory feedback control in post-stroke aphasia.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms of articulatory motor speech deficit in post-stroke aphasia: An ERP study.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Listening to the Mind: Integrating Vocal Biomarkers into Digital Health.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Individuals with aphasia generate larger adaptive and corrective responses to suddenly introduced auditory perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- The complex impact of auditory error direction, magnitude, and exposure on corrective responses.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with post-stroke aphasia exhibit deficits in regulating vocal (i.e., laryngeal) pitch control during speech vowel production; however, it is not determined whether such deficits also exist when they control their supra-laryngeal speech articulators during word production. To address this question, 19 subjects with post-stroke aphasia and 20 controls were tested under an altered auditory feedback paradigm in which they received + 30% shifts in their vowel first-formant frequency during word production. In addition, 17 aphasia subjects and 19 controls from the same groups also completed steady vowel vocalizations while receiving randomized pitch shifts at ± 100 cents. Consistent with previous findings, our data showed that the magnitude of compensatory vocal responses to pitch-shifted vowel productions was significantly reduced in individuals with aphasia vs. controls. In addition, we also found that the magnitude of compensatory articulatory responses to formant-shifted vowels during word production was significantly diminished in the aphasia group compared with controls. However, no significant correlation was found between the vocal and articulatory compensatory responses to pitch and formant alterations. These findings suggest that vocal and articulatory motor speech control are regulated via independent mechanisms, and stroke-induced damage to left-hemispheric brain networks can selectively impair them in stroke survivors with aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.