ArticleScientific reports2025
Mixed-methods study on professionals' attitudes toward harm reduction in cannabis use and the development of a knowledge translation plan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several factors limit the adoption of harm reduction in cannabis use (HR-c). A knowledge translation (KT) process can help optimize its adoption. This study aims to: (1) identify the attitudes toward HR-c of health and social services (HSS) practitioners working among young people in Quebec; and (2) develop a KT plan to enhance its adoption. Two conceptual frameworks guided the study: the Knowledge-to-Action model and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Managers and practitioners working among young people in difficulty in Quebec were recruited. Mixed methods tools were used, involving consultations (N = 14) and questionnaires (N = 167). Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis, while descriptive and inferential statistics were executed to analyze quantitative data. Participants presented positive attitudes toward HR-c (M = 44.79), negative attitudes toward abstinence-based treatments (M = 9.68), and moderate perceived levels of training in HR-c (M = 12.3). Their needs and contextual factors that might influence HR-c adoption were identified. Based on these findings, a KT plan was developed to optimize HR-c adoption by HSS practitioners. Despite some negative factors impacting its applicability, HR-c is generally accepted and implemented by practitioners. This study represents the pre-implementation phase of the KT plan, which will then guide the effective implementation of a KT process for HR-c adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.