ArticleScientific reports2025
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy guided radiotherapy boost for patients with glioblastoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- An Interpretable Multimodal Machine-Learning Model for Non-Invasive Preoperative Glioma Grading.Cancers · 2026Article
- Application of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in photo-thermal therapy response of U87-MG human glioma cells with gold-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: an in vivo study.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Biologically Guided Gamma Knife Dose Painting for Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: A Retrospective Study Using Functional MRI Techniques.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the feasibility and efficacy of delivering a radiation dose boost to high-risk glioblastoma (GBM) tumor regions, identified using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) after standard radiotherapy (RT). This retrospective study included patients newly diagnosed with GBM between January 2017 and July 2023. All patients received Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRS were performed prior to radiotherapy and after the administration of 60Gy. A biological gross tumor volume (bGTV) was delineated on the simulation CT using the image fusion with the T1 sequence with MRS data after 60Gy. Based on the bGTV volume, patients received an additional 10-20Gy. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis was applied to explore associations between clinical factors and survival. A total of 114 patients were analyzed. The median patient age was 51 years (range: 18-78 years), and 60.5% were male. Gross total resection was performed in 76 patients prior to RT. IDH1/2 wild-type was identified in 99 patients, and MGMT methylation was present in 40 patients. The median follow-up period was 34.0 months (95% CI, 27.1-40.9 months). The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were 30.0 months (95%. CI 21.5-38.5 months), and 12.0 months (95%CI 9.5-14.5 months), respectively. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the type of surgical resection and IDH1/2 mutation status were significantly associated with OS and PFS. Headache and fatigue were the most frequently reported symptoms. Delivering a RT boost to high-risk tumor regions identified by MRS after standard RT is feasible in patients with GBM and demonstrate acceptable toxicity. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.