ArticleScientific reports2025
Towards safer steel operations with a multi model framework for accident prediction and risk assessment simulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research concentrates on an introduction of a multi-model approach integrating Bayesian Networks (BN), Machine Learning (ML) models, Natural Language Processing (NLP) with Sentiment Analysis, Agent-Based Modeling (ABM), and Survival Analysis to improve predictive modelling of accident causation in high-risk steel industries. The significance of the artificial intelligence (AI) based models is that every approach complements other substantiating the hypothesis. Also, the augmentation of prediction accuracy could be achieved through AI approaches contrary to conventional methods. Results reveal that the application of AI model improves the prediction accuracy compared to conventional approaches. BN application uncovers the machine conditions and human errors responsible for causing accidents. Gradient Boosting Machines discussed equipment-related incidents, while NLP analysis demonstrated negative sentiment due to non-compliance with safety protocols. Moving forward, ABM simulations in accidents focus on personal protective equipment (PPE) compliance and machine maintenance. Survival analysis indicated the role of timely interventions in reducing severe accidents. Additionally, temporal insights aid in timing interventions, improving safety strategy efficacy. The outcome of this research discusses advancements in proactive accident prediction and risk management in high-risk steel industrial environments by addressing latent risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.