ArticleScientific reports2025
A comprehensive case study of deep learning on the detection of alpha thalassemia and beta thalassemia using public and private datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of discriminant formulas and machine learning models for detecting β-thalassemia trait in Bangladesh.PloS one · 2026Article
- Endothelial dysfunction and cardiac damage indicators in patients with β-thalassemia major under iron-chelation therapy.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Multiclass classification of thalassemia types using complete blood count and HPLC data with machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endocrine complications in patients with β-thalassemia major receiving iron-chelation therapy.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the performance of deep learning models, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and XGBoost, in predicting alpha and beta thalassemia using both public and private datasets. Thalassemia is a genetic disorder that impairs hemoglobin production, leading to anemia and other health complications. Early diagnosis is essential for effective management and prevention of severe health issues. The study applied CNN and XGBoost to two case studies: one for alpha-thalassemia and the other for beta-thalassemia. Public datasets were sourced from medical databases, while private datasets were collected from clinical records, offering a more comprehensive feature set and larger sample sizes. After data preprocessing and splitting, model performance was evaluated. XGBoost achieved 99.34% accuracy on the private dataset for alpha thalassemia, while CNN reached 98.10% accuracy on the private dataset for beta-thalassemia. The superior performance on private datasets was attributed to better data quality and volume. This study highlights the effectiveness of deep learning in medical diagnostics, demonstrating that high-quality data can significantly enhance the predictive capabilities of AI models. By integrating CNN and XGBoost, this approach offers a robust method for detecting thalassemia, potentially improving early diagnosis and reducing disease-related mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.