ArticleScientific reports2025
Quality of cerebral palsy videos on Chinese social media platforms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating pulpitis-related content on Chinese social media: platform comparison, dental practitioner impact and associated factors.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- TikTok, Xiaohongshu, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on lung cancer: a multi-platform content evaluation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of health information about atrial septal defect: a content and quality analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of short video quality and reliability of non-invasive prenatal testing on TikTok and Bilibili platforms: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of hyperlipidemia-related short videos on mainstream social media platforms: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about passive smoking on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality, reliability, and transparency of late-life depression videos on Chinese social media: a cross-sectional study of Douyin, Rednotes, and BiliBili.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Assessing the quality of myopia prevention videos on Chinese short video platforms: a cross-sectional content analysis by source.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Information quality of videos related to adolescent depression on social media platforms: a comparative study of TikTok and BiliBili.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The revival of spiritual practices: factors influencing the "seeking deities and offering prayers" behavior of China's Generation Z on social media in an atheistic context.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- TikTok, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu as sources of information on frailty: Cross-sectional content analysis study.Digital healthArticle
- Quality and reliability assessment of myocardial infarction short videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A significant research gap exists in evaluating the prevalence and quality of Chinese videos depicting CP on domestic social media platforms. In contrast to studies that focus on online video content concerning CP on YouTube, CP videos on YouTube are largely inaccessible to average citizens in mainland China. This disparity underscores the need for further investigation into the availability and nature of CP videos specifically on Chinese social media platforms. To assess the reliability and quality of short videos related to cerebral palsy (CP) on Chinese social media platforms. The present cross-sectional study examined 344 videos about CP from popular Chinese social media platforms, including TikTok, Kwai, Weibo, Bilibili, and RED. The analysis of these videos involved a detailed assessment of their sources, content, and characteristics. Additionally, quantitative scoring tools such as journal of the American medical association (JAMA) benchmarks, gobal quality score (GQS), and DISCERN were utilized to evaluate video quality. Furthermore, the potential relationship between video quality and various attributes such as duration, number of likes, and comments was explored and their impact on the quality of information presented in the videos was analyzed. The average duration of the 344 videos was 92.12 s (SD 105.69). CP rehabilitation training videos comprised 45.64% of the total, followed by expert-contributed videos at 40.70%. Mean scores for JAMA, GQS, and DISCERN were 1.62 (SD 0.60), 2.05 (SD 0.99), and 1.26 (SD 1.26) respectively. RED had the lowest average scores. Videos focusing on disease knowledge scored highest on JAMA and GQS scales. Experts achieved significantly higher GQS and DISCERN scores compared to health-related institutions and amateurs. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between likes and comments (r = .0.87, P < .0.001). Enhancing the management of medical content is crucial to address the compromised reliability of Chinese online short videos providing information to families of CP patients. Improving content professionalism and accuracy ensures users access genuinely valuable information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.