Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246847›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Global dataset combining open-source hydropower plant and reservoir data.

Jignesh Shah, Jing Hu, Oreane Y Edelenbosch, Michelle T H van Vliet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jignesh ShahDepartment of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508, TC, Utrecht, the Netherlands. j.shah@uu.nl.
Jing HuCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508, TC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1182-5687
Oreane Y EdelenboschCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508, TC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6588-5255
Michelle T H van VlietDepartment of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508, TC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-8422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydropower is a crucial renewable source that depends heavily on water availability. Analyzing drought and climate change impacts on hydropower potential requires detailed data on both hydropower plant attributes (e.g. plant type and head) and reservoir characteristics (e.g. area, depth and volume). However, existing open-source datasets are poorly integrated: hydropower plant datasets often lack reservoir information, while reservoir datasets commonly miss hydropower plant information. This paper addresses this gap by introducing GloHydroRes, a global dataset that combines existing open-source hydropower plant and reservoir datasets. GloHydroRes includes attributes like plant location, head, plant type as well as reservoir details such as dam and reservoir location, dam height, reservoir depth, area, and volume for 7,775 plants in 128 countries. GloHydroRes covers nearly 79% and 81% of the global installed capacity when compared with installed hydropower data as reported by the EIA(2022) and IRENA (2023), respectively. The open-source GloHydroRes dataset provides crucial data to improve hydropower generation modelling at plant level and can support energy security and planning at continent to global scale.

Identifiers

PMID40246847
PMCPMC12006347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.