Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40246840›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

The global determinants of climate niche breadth in birds.

João Fabrício Mota Rodrigues, Carlos A Botero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

João Fabrício Mota RodriguesIntegrative Biology Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. fabriciorodrigues303@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-4093
Carlos A BoteroIntegrative Biology Department, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0955-2795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding why certain species occupy wider climate niches than others is a fundamental pursuit in ecology with important implications for conservation and management. However, existing synthesis on this topic has focused on the consequences rather than the causes of climate niche expansion, leading to significant gaps in our understanding of the possible evolutionary drivers of this important ecological property. Here we leverage species distribution models powered by millions of citizen science sightings of birds to determine how a comprehensive suite of parameters influences the breadth of climate niches. Our analyses show that migration and more central locations in climate space are directly associated with wider climate niches. Additionally, they indicate that larger brains, smaller bodies, and broader dietary requirements are indirectly associated with narrower niches, presumably because they enable the occupancy of geographically widespread habitats that occupy narrow areas in climate niche space. Through follow-up analyses we further clarify how the different factors considered in this study help shape niche breadth by affecting the colonization of more versus less frequently used habitats. Overall, our findings shed light on critical, yet highly underappreciated properties of climate niches, underscoring the complexity and interconnectivity of the factors that shaped their evolution among birds.

Indexed as

BirdsClimateEcosystemAnimal MigrationAnimalsBiological Evolution

Identifiers

PMID40246840
PMCPMC12006339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.